By Joseph J. Collins ( Institute for National Strategic Studies) Reviewed by Amb. (ret.) Michael Cotter ( Vice. (This is a National Defense University study paper on the Iraq war. It opens “Measured in. NDU Press of INSS publishes books, monographs, reports, and occasional papers on national and international security affairs, defense policy, and military .

Author: Shagar Zulkit
Country: Japan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 21 March 2005
Pages: 273
PDF File Size: 15.64 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.71 Mb
ISBN: 461-6-38333-865-1
Downloads: 56690
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gardalkree

I find nothing in credible sources to support the notion that the WMD threat was concocted by U. In planning for and executing operations in Iraq, basic organizations, organizational cultures, operational occasional_pzpers, and legislative support systems all have been found wanting and occxsional_papers need of fundamental reform.

I like how the article says Pentagon institute to make people believe the Pentagon wrote this. The report also singles out the Bush administration’s national security apparatus and implicitly President Bush and both of his national security advisers, Condoleezza Rice and Stephen Hadley, saying that “senior national security officials exhibited in many instances an imperious attitude, exerting power and pressure where diplomacy and bargaining might have had a better effect.

The Elder Scrolls Online. No need to import more There was nothing illegal in what the department of defence did.

Strategic miscommunication | Opinion | The Guardian

These initial assumptions were a thread that ran through many missteps, and thus it is important to ask where assumptions come from. Most western countries were pretty clear on their position, they asked the US to show Iraq was an immanent threat, and the US failed to do so. That whole document reads like a list of Government stuff-ups in the decission to go to war, and i must admit i am rather surprised to see you post it Always remember, however sure you are that you can easily win, that there would not be a war if the other man did not think that he also had a chance.


I am shocked that they even noticed that the Cold War is over yet.

Click Here to comment on this article. In conclusion, the war in Iraq and its aftermath have exposed a. Bush cooked it up and pretty much all occssional_papers Congress signed off on it.

Pentagon institute call Iraq war “a major debacle” — Forums

When it works both the leader and his advisor should be praised The fact is, the United States and its allies have largely ceded the strategic communications battlefield to the insurgents and terrorists since That was before Wolkawicz and his Alice in Wonderland crew took over.

An authoritarian government can start and stop wars when it decides – democracies ostensibly require the will of the people to initiate and then carry out any type of sustained military action.

In conclusion, the war in Iraq and its aftermath have exposed a flawed decisionmaking process and weak decision execution mechanisms. This country and everyone of its citizens will be paying for this frack-up occasionalpapers years if not decades. Trump Says Partial U.

According to the U. Remember the banner on the aircraft carrier in the back of Bush’s speech, it said “Mission Accomplished”. Problem is there was no reason for the war in Iraq in the fist place. The worse part is that there is no way for us to get out of this mess with out making matters worse than what they are already.

Speculation occsaional_papers what people may have believed is useless. If the Occasionak_papers invested as much time and effort communicating to the audience of al-Jazeera as it does communicating to the audience of Fox News, more Americans soldiers in Iraq might be home by now.

Intelligence analysts, however, remind us that the only thing worse than an Iraq with an American army may be an Iraq after a rapid withdrawal of that army. Occssional_papers the time the report was written last fall, more than 4, U.


Choosing war: the decision to invade Iraq and its aftermath

I n a third-party counterinsurgency campaign pitting a strong, industrial democracy against a poorly-armed guerrilla group, the weak underbelly of the democracy carrying out the campaign is the popular support it must have to continue its war efforts. That said I would also challenge the idea that people believed he had stockpiles of WMD. As i have said previously about my thoughts on government, it is up to the leader to surround himself with people intelligent enough in their relevant fields to make informed decissions.

The administration also expected that “Iraq without Saddam could manage and fund its own reconstruction. That said, the potential for excess on the part of the government is readily apparent, and checks on abuse of power must be firmly established.

Strategic miscommunication

Now the Pentagon says it’s a bad idea? Add us on Google Plus. Loading comments… Trouble loading?

Wall Street advanced in low-volume trading on Monday occasional_papwrs revelers gathered to ring inmarking the end of the worst. Rise of the Fallen. They were either deceitful or entirely incompetent, although im still not entirely sure which is better. One hopes that, for all of. The addition of 30, U.

Government officials and then sold to a gullible public, nor do I believe that any one Iraqi source tricked us into our beliefs. Originally posted by unconformed im not sure what you mean by stuff-ups so i am a little lost to how to take your comment.